clachere.b

ISPs give clean feed filter a technical green-light
David Ramli 24 July, 2009 15:51:00

The majority of Internet filter trial participants report no slowdowns or accidental blockings despite ISP filtering.
More than half of the Internet service providers (ISPs) taking part in the Federal Government’s ISP filtering trial have reported minimal speed disruptions or technology problems.
Of the nine participating ISPs, iPrimus, Netforce, Webshield, Nelson Bay Online and OMNIconnect told ARN they had seen no slowdowns in Internet speeds or problems with the filtering solutions in place.
Of the remaining four ISPs, Tech2U and Highway1 were unable to respond by time of publication while Unwired and Optus refused to comment.
iPrimus Australia CEO, Ravi Bhatia, said his company’s ISP filtering trial, which must be opted into by its customers, had “probably involved a few thousand users”.
“The users have not experienced any problems, they haven’t experienced any service degradation so it’s been a pretty good experience,” he said.
The results would be finalised by next week, Bhatia said.
Webshield managing director, Anthony Pillion, said his entire customer base of a few thousand end-users experienced no slow-down in Internet speeds whatsoever.
“From a technical perspective we’re more than confident that if the government decided to roll out a mandatory Internet filter based on or around an Australian Communications and Media Authority [ACMA] blacklist or subset thereof, then it can be done without any impact whatsoever to the speed of the Internet,” he said.
Although OMNIconnect’s managing director, Peter Hutton, received no complaints about slowed speeds or technical problems after the filtering hardware was in place, he said the blacklist provided by ACMA had banned legitimate websites and caused customer dissatisfaction.
“Some of the customers complained because the block list really hadn’t been moderated well enough,” OMNIconnect chief technician, Graeme Lee, said. “One in particular was a site called Redtube.com. The whole site had been blocked and it was just a standard pornography site,” Hutton said.
“Relating to that particular site we did have complaints that people couldn’t get through to it. They opted out of the trial straight away. It was a very embarrassing experience.”
ACMA refused to confirm or deny the website's legality or if it was currently on the blacklist and advised users to read its guidelines for rating internet content.
One common issue with most of the ISPs was the lack of voluntary participants, especially with companies using an opt-in system.
Managing director of Nelson Bay Online, Patrick Sayer, said only 1 per cent of his entire customer base decided to opt-into the system, resulting in just 15 users.
When asked if he believed the trials provided a fair representative study, Hutton’s answer was an unequivocal “no”.
“That’s why we’ve asked for an extension to continue the trial till the end of this month and I understand a number of other ISPs have done the same thing,” he said.
The results come on the back of earlier comments from the Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Stephen Conroy that the current trial’s success or failure would help form much of the government’s opinions on mandatory nation-wide ISP filtering.
“We'll be guided by that trial. We've always said, consistently, we'll be guided by the trial,” the Minister said on the ABC’s Q&A program.

From my understading, Kevin Rudd wants to turn Australia's internet into communist China. This is pretty much impossible because it takes away the rights we have as Australian citizens. We have the right to free speech and the internet is medium of communication and by blocking and censoring the internet is taking away a form of expression. The filters will slow down the already slow connection we have in Australia. On top of this, internet savy people (mostly the reason why the clean feed will be put into place) will be creating proxy servers to get around the censorship and leaving the rest of us to suffer with the concequences of their internet behaviour. Why should the general Australian public suffer while it is a small minority group that has encouraged this type of censorship.

In the way of censorship, this can dictate what we can access and view on the internet. Someone might decide that youtube is offencive and block the site; then what happens to those who use the site to promote their videos gain access to the public domain?

Yes can see why the clean feed sounds like a good idea. To prevent sex acts on the internet and terrorism and what not, but what happens to the "Australia is a free country! We are democratic not communist",this just happens to fly out the window. Australian internet, say hello to China.